My MIL Fed My Toddler Half a Battenberg Cake and Jelly Babies, Then Claimed ‘Grandma’s Rights’.
It’s a truth universally acknowledged that grandparents get to spoil their grandchildren. A little biscuit here, a small toy there—it’s one of the sweet perks of the job, a lovely tradition that bridges generations. But what happens when “spoiling” crosses a line into outright defiance of a parent’s wishes?
One mother recently took to an online forum to share a story about her mother-in-law’s sugary sabotage, and it proves that not everyone understands where the boundaries lie.
The Incident
This young mother explained that while she once had a great relationship with her mother-in-law, things became strained after her son was born. She described her as “completely overbearing,” walking into their bedroom unannounced and demanding sleepovers with her grandson. But the real battle began over sweets.
The parents were trying to limit their three-year-old’s sugar intake, a reasonable goal for any parent. They even had a “very sensitive conversation” with the grandmother, citing the dentist’s advice, and she seemed to agree.
However, the agreement was short-lived. The grandmother soon began giving her grandson treats behind their backs, and the problem escalated dramatically. The mother was horrified to discover what a “treat” in her mother-in-law’s house entailed: “half a full size battenburg cake, a full pack of jelly babies, sweet yoghurts, a gingerbread man all in the space of one day.”

Her poor son would come home “completely wired” and agitated, making life difficult for everyone. When confronted again, the grandmother got “sulky, talking about grandmas rights.” To make matters worse, the mother-in-law has her own serious health problems related to her diet, making her behavior feel not just disrespectful, but deeply concerning.
The Internet Reacts
The online community was quick to weigh in, and the vast majority were firmly in the mother’s corner. Their reactions fell into a few distinct camps.
First, there was the “Absolutely Not” Crowd, who were simply appalled by the grandmother’s audacity. They felt her behavior was a shocking breach of trust. One commenter captured the general sentiment perfectly, writing, “I actually thought you were going to be getting in a huff over half a pack of buttons but I’m Shock Shock Shock at that amount of sweet stuff in one day.”
Another user dismissed the grandmother’s excuses entirely, stating, “There’s no such thing as ‘grandma’s rights’. Having a relationship with your GC is not a right, it’s a privilege.” The consensus here was clear: parent rights trump all.
Then came the Armchair Psychologists, who tried to understand the grandmother’s troubling motives. They suspected something deeper was at play than just a desire to spoil her grandson. “She sounds like she needs… help,” one person suggested, “I think she possibly thinks love is food… food is love.”
Another added a fascinating insight, wondering if the grandmother was trying to make her grandson a “partner in crime” to justify her own eating habits. This camp viewed the grandmother with a mixture of pity and alarm, seeing her actions as a projection of her own unresolved issues.

Finally, the Practical Solutions Crowd offered straightforward, no-nonsense advice. They weren’t interested in revenge, just in protecting the child. The most popular suggestion was to end all unsupervised visits immediately. As one person put it, “She would not be allowed to spend time with my child unsupervised… she is ignoring you, therefore can not be trusted.” Another offered a clear path forward: “She visits the kids at your house and you and DH only ever take the kids round to hers yourself and don’t leave them with her.”
The Etiquette Verdict
Let’s be perfectly clear: this grandmother is completely out of line. While spoiling grandchildren is a time-honored tradition, it must always be done within the boundaries set by the parents. Parenting is a tough job, and a grandparent’s role is to support, not to undermine.
To deliberately and repeatedly ignore a parent’s reasonable request regarding their child’s health is the height of disrespect. The notion of “grandparent rights” is a myth; a relationship with a grandchild is a privilege built on trust and respect, both of which have been broken here. The golden rule is simple: the parents’ house, the parents’ rules.

Your Thoughts
Is this grandmother’s behavior a simple case of spoiling that’s gone too far, or is it a deliberate act of disrespect that warrants cutting off unsupervised visits?
