Coworker Hoarded All 27 Nuggets From the Free Office Lunch. I Banned Her From Our Paid Chinese Takeout.
From a very young age, we are taught one of the most fundamental rules of polite society: you must learn to share. This simple lesson in fairness is meant to follow us into adulthood, especially in communal spaces like the workplace. When a kind boss treats the office to lunch, the unspoken rule is that everyone gets to partake.
However, one woman recently took to the internet to share a story that proves not everyone abides by these basic tenets of decency. Her tale of a greedy colleague and a dose of cold revenge has everyone talking about what is and isn’t acceptable when it comes to office etiquette.
The Incident
The story begins with a generous gesture. A boss at a media house decided to order McDonald’s for the entire office. As many of the employees were vegetarian, there were fewer non-vegetarian items available, including three 9-piece boxes of chicken nuggets.
Enter “Amy,” a 29-year-old colleague who apparently decided the nuggets were for her and her alone. She took all 27 nuggets to her desk, even stashing some in her bag for later. When the storyteller, a 25-year-old freelancer, walked by and politely asked for just one, Amy’s response was shocking. She didn’t just say no; she “legit screams out ‘no!'” and snatched the box away from her.
Other colleagues who asked were met with the same hostile refusal. It was, as the freelancer put it, “infuriating to see a grown woman behave this way.”
A few days later, the freelancer decided to organize a group lunch order from a local Chinese restaurant. She went around the office and collected orders and money from everyone—everyone except Amy. When the food arrived and the group sat down to eat, Amy noticed and wandered over.

After some small talk, she grabbed a plate to serve herself, only to be stopped. The freelancer calmly informed her that she couldn’t have any, as they had all ordered and paid for it themselves. Amy, in disbelief, slammed the plate on the table and stormed off.
The Internet Reacts
The office was divided on the issue, and so was the internet. The story sparked a fierce debate, with people falling into a few distinct camps.
The first was the “Absolutely Not” Crowd, who were furious on the freelancer’s behalf. They felt Amy’s initial greed was so far beyond the pale that she deserved exactly what she got. One commenter put it simply: “She doesn’t want to share = she doesn’t get to take a share. Simple as that.”
Another chimed in, “Well if it isn’t the consequences of Amy’s actions.” The sheer audacity of hoarding 27 nuggets meant for an entire office was what sealed the deal for most. As one person wrote, “27 nuggets is an obscene amount of nuggets to hoard when they’re supposed to be for everyone.”
Then there was the “Devil’s Advocate” camp. While no one defended Amy’s nugget-hoarding, some felt that excluding her was unprofessional and could backfire. They worried about the situation escalating in the workplace. One user warned, “My HR team would call this bullying ‘by exclusion’ and leaving one team member out of a lunch group is a specific example of this.”
Another suggested that direct communication would have been better, though many wondered how you could reason with someone who screams over a chicken nugget. One person cautioned, “Be careful because she may present events like this to higher ups very differently than how they happen, and make you look like the bad guy.”

Finally, the “Petty Revenge” Crowd delighted in the story and offered their own witty suggestions for what they would have said to Amy. “We would have asked you if you wanted to order lunch today, but we figured you were still full from the chicken nuggets,” one popular comment read. Another user added they would have asked, “…how she could still be hungry after eating the entire office’s supply of nuggets.”
The Etiquette Verdict
Let’s be clear: in a professional environment, excluding a single person from a group activity is typically a breach of etiquette. It can create a hostile atmosphere and is generally unkind. However, this situation is the exception that proves the rule. Amy’s behavior was not just a minor slip-up; it was aggressive, selfish, and deeply disrespectful to her colleagues.
She hoarded food meant for everyone and then yelled at people who politely asked for a small share. The golden rule of the workplace is to treat others with respect. Amy broke that rule first, and in a spectacular fashion. The freelancer didn’t steal Amy’s food or yell at her; she simply created a boundary. The lunch she organized was a private purchase, and Amy was not entitled to it. Sometimes, the most effective etiquette lesson is experiencing the natural consequences of one’s own poor manners.

Your Thoughts
This whole situation leaves us with a tricky question about navigating workplace conflicts. Do you always take the high road, or are there times when a taste of one’s own medicine is the only language some people understand?
Was this a case of justified payback, or should the freelancer have included her greedy colleague anyway?
Ready for the next level of insight? Discover more in my latest article here.
